Voice
in the Crowd
by
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






Don’t Kill the Messenger

Nobody likes unpleasant news, uncomplimentary words.  It’s much nicer to have someone say “you’re losing weight” than “boy, are you getting fat.”  No woman wants someone to call her new hairdo ugly.  It is so much nicer to hear pleasing words.  It makes our day.  Bad news ruins it.

On a city scale in Chattanooga, officials decided they wanted to turn McCallie and Bailey into two-way streets.  They didn’t expect dissent and when it came turned a deaf ear.  Councilman Ron Littlefield even had the courage to fuss at First Presbyterian Church for not wanting the change.  It would have been so much nicer if everyone had gone in lockstep with the plan.  They didn’t.  Unpleasant descriptions of Chattanooga leadership, even suspicion of special interests.  No doubt some in City Hall would like to silence the complaints.

When you want something, it’s easier to assume everyone wants it, and to turn a deaf ear.

On a statewide basis in Tennessee, no one has ever said former Gov. Don Sundquist isn’t a good man.  Two elections gave him overwhelming support.  Along the way budget problems arose and weren’t recognized.  Nashville observers say he never wanted unpleasant news.  It’s much safer for yes men to not report storm clouds and to predict only sunny weather.  This situation provided disastrous for the state when the gathering budget crisis might have been brought under control.  One of the most popular governors in state history was literally booed at ball games.  He didn’t listen to the right messengers.

To his credit, of course, the legislators are the ones who pass the tax bills.  No one seems to have been listening to critical voices.

Hopefully, Governor Phil Bredesen will have the political sense to have some advisers who will tell him what he needs to hear without fear of offending him.

Presidents and prime ministers are no different.  They like flattering words and justification for what hey want to do.  Everyone is supposed to go along.  On a national or international level this can be disastrous.  If the man in charge won’t listen to criticism, we are in trouble.

During President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s day there was a columnist who disagreed with almost everything, especially if it came from FDR.  He even wrote a book called “The Dissenting Opinions of Westbrook Pegler.”  He was a thorn in the New Deal’s side, but he carried a message loudly that everyone needed to hear—the other side of the situation.

When he was Hamilton County Executive, Dalton Roberts told his staff he wanted them to tell him what he needed to know, whether he liked it or not.  His standing rule was that it would be unpleasant for a staff member who didn’t give him the unvarnished truth when he needed to know something.  Most of his staff meeting turned into near shouting matches of dissension.

In ancient times, a messenger with pleasing news was rewarded handsomely.  Someone bearing bad news was put to death.

No matter what the issue, without a doubt President George W. Bush, Prime Minister Tony Blair and even Saddam Hussein have staff members who have messages they need to hear.  Bush and Blair might not like the message, but pity the person foolish enough to disagree with Saddam.

The wise man will listen first to the opinion opposite for his own.

The foolish man will kill the messenger.  But the message won’t go away.